My friends, accountability is finally arriving for the agitators, facilitators, and bureaucrats who believe the law doesn’t apply to them.
And Minnesota is the proving ground.
Governor Tim Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison, and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey have been served grand jury subpoenas related to alleged efforts to obstruct ICE operations. Get ready for a healthy does of this narrative: “Trump is targeting his political enemies.”
But don’t fall for it.
No one forced these officials to (allegedly) coordinate resistance against federal law enforcement. No one forced them to signal, encourage, or potentially assist obstruction. When people knowingly engage in conduct that invites legal scrutiny, accountability isn’t tyranny — it’s justice.
This is what enforcement looks like after years of intentional lawlessness.
Accountability is not optional in a constitutional republic.
Make no mistake: Minnesota isn’t the end. In fact, California has already been put on notice. When the federal government actually enforces immigration law, the Radical Left panics — because lawlessness has become central to their strategy, their coalition, and their narrative.
That’s why you’ll hear comparisons to Hitler.
That’s why the media will scream.
That’s why context will be ignored.
But none of the shenanigans will work for those who know the routine — who understand who we’re fighting and how they fight.
On today’s Toddcast, we also provide an update on one of the latest charades pulled by the Dramacrats — the storming of Cities Church in St. Paul — and why arrests are imminent. Kristi Noem lays out exactly why this crossed the line, and why journalists who stop reporting and start organizing may find themselves accountable too.
Justice is not political persecution.
Law enforcement is not authoritarianism.
And accountability is not optional.
Conservative, not bitter.
Todd
Key Highlights from Today’s Toddcast
🔥 Subpoenas in Minnesota are not tyranny — they’re accountability
⚖️ Obstructing federal law enforcement invites legal consequences
🗺️ Minnesota is the proving ground; California has been put on notice
🧠 The ‘Trump-as-Hitler’ narrative is a preemptive defense mechanism
⛪ Storming a church is not protest — it’s trespass and intimidation
📜 The First Amendment protects worship, not trespass and disruption
🎥 Journalism ends where activism and orchestration begin
🧩 Law enforcement restores order; chaos is the moral failure
Today’s Stack of Stuff
The Stack of Stuff honors the memory of Rush Limbaugh by keeping his iconic phrase alive — only this time, it’s digital. These links give you context for today’s Toddcast, including pieces that back me up, push back, or simply lay out the facts so you can decide for yourself.
For more on today’s Toddcast, visit today’s Stack on our website and dig in.
Quote of the Day
Where law ends, tyranny begins — not the other way around.
You Don’t Need to Be Technical. Just Informed
AI isn’t optional anymore—but coding isn’t required.
The AI Report gives business leaders the edge with daily insights, use cases, and implementation guides across ops, sales, and strategy.
Trusted by professionals at Google, OpenAI, and Microsoft.
👉 Get the newsletter and make smarter AI decisions.
Todd Talk: 2025 Deportations Prove Border Security Was Always Possible
My friends, the 2025 deportation numbers are in, and they’re better than expected. According to administration reports, roughly 540,000 illegal immigrants were formally removed last year. About 230,000 were arrested and deported from inside the United States. Another 270,000 were removed after apprehension at the border, and around 40,000 accepted a stipend to self-deport.
Add the estimated 1.9 million people who left on their own, with no arrest, stipend, or paperwork, and we have an estimated 2.5 million departures.
The border is secure, with crossings down 93 percent — and not one new act of Congress was required.
Turns out, yet again, Trump was right. We didn’t need a new law. We needed a new president who was serious about illegal immigration.
The Border Was Never “Impossible”
It was just never enforced.
One of the biggest cons the political class ever pulled was this line: “Border security is complicated.”
Translation: Please stop asking us to do our job.
And then 2025 happened.
Thanks to Donald Trump, the border is secure again, and Congress didn’t pass some magical new law to make that happen.
Turns out, when the federal government actually enforces the laws already on the books, results show up fast.
We’re talking about crossings dropping by roughly 93% year over year—a staggering collapse in illegal traffic that didn’t require a “comprehensive immigration package,” a bipartisan committee, or a 2,000-page bill no one read.
So what changed?
Not the law.
The will of the president.
According to DHS updates in late 2025, the administration touted over half a million deportations/removals and claimed more than 2.5 million illegal aliens left the U.S. through a mix of enforcement and “self-deportation.” They also rolled out (and then expanded) incentives for voluntary departures—reported by Reuters as a $3,000 stipend plus flights for some participants who use the CBP Home app.
If border crossings plunge into the basement almost overnight, it tells you something the lawless Radical Leftists never wanted us to realize: Border security was always possible.
Not with a new “system.”
Not with new “frameworks.”
Not with more word games.
But with enforcement. Simple. Strong. Enforcement.
The Left panics because lawlessness isn’t an accident anymore — it’s become their strategy. And if the country realizes the border can be controlled simply by enforcing existing law, the entire narrative collapses.
And then they begin wondering what else could improve in our nation.
They told you it couldn’t be done.
They told you it would take decades.
They told you you were “extreme” for wanting it.
And then it happened anyway — without a single new act of Congress.
So the question isn’t “Can we secure the border?” We know we can.
The real question is: who benefits when we pretend we can’t?


