In partnership with

Todd's Take

My friends, yesterday Dr. Fauci sat before a Senate committee and pleaded the Fifth Amendment rather than answer questions about his role in COVID. I want to walk you through why that's an even bigger mess than it looks on the surface.

Start with the obvious: the Fifth Amendment protects you from being forced to testify against yourself when your own words could put you in criminal jeopardy. That's real, and it's yours whether I like how someone's using it or not.

But here's the wrinkle nobody on cable news explained yesterday. Fauci already has a full, preemptive presidential pardon from Joe Biden, signed on his way out the door with the autopen in January 2025. A pardon like that means he can't be prosecuted for anything connected to this time period.

And the Supreme Court settled this exact question back in 1972, in a case called Kastigar v. United States: if the government grants you immunity that's "coextensive" with your Fifth Amendment privilege — meaning nothing you say, and nothing derived from it, can be used to convict you — then the Fifth Amendment no longer shields you from testifying. It only protects you from prosecution. Take away the prosecution risk, and the shield doesn't apply anymore.

So on paper, Fauci's blanket pardon should mean Congress can compel him to answer. He can still be held accountable for perjury or contempt if he lies today, but not for anything he actually did during COVID.

Except — and this is where it gets messier — that pardon was reportedly signed using Biden’s magical autopen, in the final chaotic days of an administration we already knew was struggling with an incapacitated president. If it turns out President Biden never personally approved that pardon, the whole thing could be challenged as unconstitutional. Which would mean Fauci's Fifth Amendment plea suddenly means something very different than it did yesterday.

Bottom line, my friends, is that we've been told for years that Donald Trump is the singular existential threat to American “democracy.” Meanwhile we have a health official who managed a national response through TV interviews and phone calls to governors, kept two sets of books — one for cameras, one for his diary — got a blanket pardon nobody's sure was properly signed, and is now hiding behind an amendment that may not even apply to him.

I'm not asking you to hate the man. I'm asking you to notice which threats to “democracy” actually get covered, and which ones get a pass because of who's wearing the white coat.

Conservative, not bitter.
Todd

A Word From One Of Our Partners — Soltea

Heart health isn't something I take lightly, especially as I get older, and that's why I want to tell you about Soltea. It's a caffeine-free supplement built around a patented green tea extract that's clinically shown to help lower cholesterol — one simple soft gel a day, no needles, no prescription hoops.

It's produced by a company in Nashville, Tennessee, founded by Crom Carmichael, who wanted something that actually fits into real life instead of demanding you overhaul it.

If you want to take control of your heart health the natural way, head to Soltea.com and use promo code TODD for 50% off your first 3-month supply, plus free shipping.

Quote of the Day

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."

John Adams

Stack of Stuff

  • Bloomberg's original report on yesterday's hearing — Fauci invoking the Fifth Amendment on COVID-era questions before the Senate: Bloomberg.

  • NPR's rundown of the same hearing, including how it ties back to his diary and the pandemic-origins debate: NPR.

  • ABC News on exactly which questions Fauci refused to answer, and why: ABC News.

  • Sophie Cunningham's own response after a Seattle Storm co-owner allegedly cursed out two teenage girls for holding a sign thanking her for standing up for girls' sports: RedState.

  • The Storm's apology and the WNBA's response, including the suspension handed down: Al Jazeera.

Culture Watch: Media

One of the quieter fights in this Cold Civil War is over who gets to ask questions without being punished for it. Back during COVID, if you raised even a mild question about what Dr. Fauci was telling the country, you got treated like you'd threatened someone's grandmother. This show had videos pulled off Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube for nothing more than asking questions. That's not free speech holding the powerful accountable and searching for truth. That's power deciding which questions are allowed to exist.

A journalist's job is to report facts without inserting an opinion. A commentator — which is what I am, and I say so openly — argues a point of view out in the open, where you can weigh it and agree or disagree with it. What we got from most of the media during COVID was neither. It was advocacy dressed up as neutral reporting, enforcing one approved set of answers and treating every honest question as a threat.

Fauci's own diary — and now his refusal to answer questions under oath — holds the receipts. The people who were "just asking questions" in 2020 and 2021 weren't enemies of the truth. They were doing exactly what a free press and a free people are supposed to do.

This is why it’s important to support the outlets and voices willing to ask the uncomfortable question and let you decide the answer for yourself.

From Today's Show

🎧 Listen to today's full episode → toddhuffshow.com/listen

Wish your car insurance was pricier? Didn’t think so.

Find out if another carrier could offer you a better rate. Compare your offers all in one place and get your best rate on LendingTree. Just answer a few questions and get your quotes in a matter of minutes.

Before You Go

Follow us: Facebook · Instagram
Support businesses that share your values at Freedom Marketplace
Own a business? Advertise with us

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading