In partnership with

My friends, last week, I got a text from someone I care about. It was short. Direct. And maybe even a wee bit demanding: “Explain to me Greenland and Venezuela.”

On today’s Toddcast, I decided to tackle the first half of that text. (We’ll save Venezuela for another day!) And, not surprisingly, it took me an entire episode and not a couple of text messages.

Greenland has become one of those topics that people hear about, roll their eyes at, and move on from — without ever stopping to ask what’s actually going on.

It was never really about making Greenland the 51st state. That line grabbed headlines, sure — but if you take Trump literally instead of seriously, you miss the point entirely. What this was really about is leverage. Power. Control of the Arctic in a rapidly changing world.

This was never about owning Greenland — it was about leverage, influence, and making sure America isn’t locked out of the Arctic future.

Todd Huff

Here’s the reality: the Arctic is no longer a frozen afterthought. Melting ice has opened new shipping lanes. The region is loaded with rare earth minerals, energy resources, and strategic positioning. And Greenland — sitting right between North America, Europe, and Russia — is the single most important piece of that puzzle.

Russia knows it. They’ve invested heavily in Arctic military infrastructure, submarine routes, missile defenses, and radar systems. China knows it too. They call themselves a “near-Arctic state” and are quietly embedding economic and research influence so they can’t be excluded later. This isn’t theory — it’s happening now.

So when Trump started talking about Greenland, tariffs followed. Pressure was asserted. NATO got involved. Europe froze trade talks. Deadlines were set. And then, suddenly, a framework deal emerged — tariffs pulled back, Arctic cooperation elevated, NATO stepping in to address the broader security implications.

No sovereign land changed hands. No flags were planted. But the negotiation moved — exactly as intended.

That’s the part most people miss.

Trump negotiates by shifting the frame. He starts extreme, applies pressure outside the core issue, forces urgency, and then declares victory while the details get hammered out. You don’t have to like his style — but you should at least understand it.

This isn’t about conquest. It’s about ensuring that the United States and its allies have a seat at the table in one of the most strategically important regions of the 21st century. In a modern world, power isn’t necessarily measured by how much land you own. It’s measured by influence, access, and control.

Greenland is the choke point. And ignoring that reality doesn’t make it go away.

My goal today wasn’t to convince you to love Trump, or even agree with every tactic he uses. My goal was to help you see the seriousness of what’s unfolding — beneath the headlines, beneath the noise, beneath the literal interpretations.

Whether we pay attention or not, the Arctic will shape global security, trade, and stability for decades to come.

And that’s something worth understanding.

Conservative, not bitter.
Todd

Key Highlights from Today’s Toddcast

🧊 Greenland as the Arctic choke point
♟️ Negotiation vs. literal interpretation
🌍 NATO’s quiet but critical role
🇷🇺 Russia’s Arctic military strategy
🇨🇳 China’s economic infiltration of the Arctic
⏳ Why leverage matters more than land

Today’s Stack of Stuff

The Stack of Stuff honors the memory of Rush Limbaugh by keeping his iconic phrase alive — only this time, it’s digital. These links give you context for today’s Toddcast, including pieces that back me up, push back, or simply lay out the facts so you can decide for yourself.

For more on today’s Toddcast, visit today’s Stack on our website and dig in.

Quote of the Day

To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.

George Washington

You Don’t Need to Be Technical. Just Informed

AI isn’t optional anymore—but coding isn’t required.

The AI Report gives business leaders the edge with daily insights, use cases, and implementation guides across ops, sales, and strategy.

Trusted by professionals at Google, OpenAI, and Microsoft.

👉 Get the newsletter and make smarter AI decisions.

Todd Talk: Will the Clintons Finally Face Accountability Under the Law?

My friends, will the Clintons finally face justice, or will the political ruling class protect them again?

On Wednesday, the House Oversight Committee voted to advance contempt resolutions against Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton after they refused to comply with subpoenas.

If you’ve followed politics, you know the Clintons have been surrounded by troubling allegations for decades. I won’t say too much — wouldn’t want a mysterious single-car accident with cut brake lines.

During the Biden administration, Democrats did the same thing to Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon over ignoring January 6 subpoenas — and both served prison time.

My friends, this shouldn’t be about revenge. That’s un-American. But we can’t give Democrat political elites a free pass. Justice should be blind.

So what do you think — same old story, or has accountability finally arrived?

No Power. No Phones. No Second Chances.

What would you do if the power went out tomorrow … and didn’t come back?

No lights. No heat. No water. No phones. No internet.

That’s not fear-mongering. That’s reality in a world facing EMP attacks, solar flares, and an aging power grid that barely works on a good day.

That’s why smart, prepared Americans are turning to EMP Shield.

EMP Shield is made right here in the USA and designed to protect your home, vehicle, RV, or generator from EMPs, lightning strikes, and power surges. It installs easily and works automatically. No subscriptions. No gimmicks. Just real protection when it matters most.

You insure your home. You insure your car. Why wouldn’t you protect your power?

Visit EMPShield.com and use promo code TODD to save at checkout.

Don’t wait for the warning sign.

Protect your family. Protect your freedom.

Taking Trump Seriously Without Taking Him Literally

My friends, if there’s one mistake people make when trying to understand Donald Trump, it’s this: they insist on taking him literally but not seriously.

And that misunderstanding explains almost everything about the Greenland story.

Back in September 2016, Salena Zito wrote a now-famous line in The Atlantic that nailed it: “the press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally.”

That’s the lens.

When Trump floated the idea of Greenland becoming the 51st state, critics laughed, scoffed, and even dismissed it as absurd. Supporters didn’t necessarily believe it was going to happen either — but they understood something else was going on.

Trump wasn’t talking about real estate. He was talking about leverage.

This is straight out of the approach he’s used for decades and even wrote about in The Art of the Deal: start extreme, shift the frame, apply pressure somewhere unexpected, create urgency, and force serious players to the table.

That’s exactly what happened.

Tariffs were threatened. Deadlines were set. Europe froze trade talks. NATO leadership got involved. And suddenly, after high-level talks, a “framework” for future Arctic cooperation has reportedly emerged.

No land changed hands.

No flags were planted.

But the conversation moved — and it moved fast.

That’s the part Trump’s critics miss.

Greenland matters not because America wants to own it, but because the Arctic is becoming one of the most strategically important regions on earth. Shipping lanes are opening. Resources are accessible. Military positioning matters again.

And America cannot afford to sit on the sidelines while Russia pushes deeper militarily and China embeds itself economically under the label of a “near-Arctic state.”

In the modern world, power isn’t measured by how much land you control. It’s measured by influence, access, and whether you get a seat at the table.

Trump’s style may irritate some. It may offend others. But dismissing it because it’s loud or unconventional doesn’t make it ineffective.

Greenland was never about becoming a state. (Though if anyone could pull that off, Trump could … right?)

It was about making sure America isn’t frozen out of the future.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading